Saturday, March 31, 2007
Thursday, March 29, 2007
Coalition for a Conservative Majority
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Humility
Monday, March 26, 2007
A Vote Too Far
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Posted Friday, March 23, 2007 4:20 PM PT
Congress: In passing a bill that will force a timetable for withdrawal of U.S. troops in Iraq, Democrats have again shown why they can't be trusted with our nation's security — or with spending money responsibly.
How sad that Congress' new majority didn't have the guts to take a straight-up vote on withdrawing troops without linking it to all sorts of pork-barrel spending.
This shows Democrats don't have the courage of their convictions — unless bribed. As far as party ideals go, using our troops as a bargaining chip for pork really descends to the basement.
Thursday, March 22, 2007
An open letter to Congressman Nick Lampson
I am a conservative voter. Although I usually vote Republican, I hesitate to claim party affiliation because--in my view--the only politicians worse than Republicans are Democrats. To be perfectly honest, then, it's highly unlikely that you'll ever get my vote.
I also want to tell you that I'm a Marine veteran of Vietnam who clearly remembers how the Democratic party cut funding for South Vietnam after the Paris peace accords were signed, an act that I sincerely believe led directly to the slaughter of thousands in southeast Asia. I also believe, sincerely, that a similar carnage would result from the premature withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq. This bill will also--correctly--cement the reputation of Democrats as the party of appeasement.
I plead with you, therefore, to oppose the effort by Speaker Pelosi to tie war funds to a withdrawal date. As a veteran I can state for a fact that this can only harm the morale of our troops and play into the hands of al-Qaida.
Thanks for your time,
Cliff Raymond
Sugar Land
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Choice
--G. K. Chesterton (Orthodoxy, 1908)
Monday, March 19, 2007
Men without chests
Saturday, March 17, 2007
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY Posted Tuesday, March 13, 2007 4:20 PM PST
Environmentalism: Even green-friendly media are daring to ask if higher temps are really just part of a natural cycle that could peak before all the forecast doom and gloom. Has Al Gore oversold man-made global warming?
The New York Times, seeing a chance the debate could shift in favor of alternative sources for recent warming, cautiously threw some cold water on Gore's overheated rhetoric.
In Tuesday's issue, it opened the possibility that some of his central claims are 'exaggerated and erroneous,' and deigned to recognize scientists who have challenged him.
'A few see natural variation as more central to global warming than heat-trapping gases' produced by cars and factories, the Times reported.
A few? Hardly a week goes by without a new research paper questioning the assumption that carbon-spewing humans are the cause of global warming. Many blame solar activity instead. Because such reports don't fit with the left's anti-industry agenda, they've been buried in the debate.
Most recently, National Geographic News cited new NASA data showing that ice caps near Mars' south pole have been melting due to milder temps on that planet, too.
As far as we know, no Martians drive SUVs. Or run factories. Or do anything else that could produce evil 'greenhouse gases.' So what could be warming the two planets simultaneously?
Thursday, March 15, 2007
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Generations
an essay by Cliff Raymond
Communicating values between generations has always been difficult, since it is the nature of youth to question the assumptions and values of the previous generation. By and large, this "generation gap" is a healthy phenomena: worthy values tend to survive and are reinforced by the testing process, while faulty assumptions are replaced by new ideas that will be tested by the next generation.
But if we fail to communicate those ideas that we believe are important, if we do not pass on the lessons that our parents were taught by their parents, then we spawn a generation with no compass, doomed to repeat the mistakes of history that were not effectively communicated. In short, we are left with a nation in decline, a society in chaos -- a television-addicted nation where the generation "gap" has become a gulf of illegitimacy and broken marriages.
Unintended consequences
In America, the "unintended consequence" seems to have replaced the Constitution as the law of the land. Before the stigma of divorce was relaxed during the 60's, the divorce rate averaged 25% to 30%. By 1990, the "glue" of stigma was so diluted that half of all marriages foundered, often at the first sign of rough weather. The same people who hold a "no pain, no gain" attitude about jogging or aerobics will throw in the towel at the first hint of marital problems.
The original idea, of course, was that disintegrating bad marriages would allow us to find fulfillment with more compatible partners. Children were widely believed to be resilient enough that they could adapt, and even profit, from the separation of unhappy partners. In many cases, no doubt, that was true -- particularly in abusive situations. Most divorces, however, are the result of "incompatibilities" rather than violence, and the single-parent household is now widely acknowledged to be one of the biggest contributors to our welfare and crime problems.
Another stigma that has been relaxed is the one that used to shame "loose" women, irresponsible boys, and bastard children. Girls with bad reputations have always been popular with young men -- at least until they got pregnant. Not surprisingly, girls that "go all the way" are still in great demand by boys influenced more by hormones than an overriding concern for society.
Life is terribly unfair in that an unmarried mother has always suffered more than the father. This injustice has pervaded just about all societies throughout recorded history.
In today's America, though, loose girls are no longer treated with contempt. As a result, even more girls are ready and willing to join in the fun. After all, it's not "fair" that a girl should be shunned for doing something that a boy is expected to do (at least by other boys). Still, it's amazing how—in the name of sexual freedom—these young women so casually discard the incredible power they hold over men.
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
Paradoxes of Christianity
The real trouble with this world of ours is not that it is an unreasonable world, nor even that it is a reasonable one. The commonest kind of trouble is that it is nearly reasonable, but not quite. Life is not an illogicality; yet it is a trap for logicians. It looks just a little more mathematical and regular than it is; its exactitude is obvious, but its inexactitude is hidden; its wildness lies in wait. I give one coarse instance of what I mean. Suppose some mathematical creature from the moon were to reckon up the human body; he would at once see that the essential thing about it was that it was duplicate. A man is two men, he on the right exactly resembling him on the left. Having noted that there was an arm on the right and one on the left, a leg on the right and one on the left, he might go further and still find on each side the same number of fingers, the same number of toes, twin eyes, twin ears, twin nostrils, and even twin lobes of the brain. At last he would take it as a law; and then, where he found a heart on one side, would deduce that there was another heart on the other. And just then, where he most felt he was right, he would be wrong.
G. K. Chesterton, from Orthodoxy (Chapter 6, The Paradoxes of Christianity)