From www.news.com.au:
Having large families should be frowned upon as an environmental misdemeanour in the same way as frequent long-haul flights, driving a big car and failing to reuse plastic bags, says a report to be published today by a green think tank. The paper by the Optimum Population Trust will say that if couples had two children instead of three they could cut their family's carbon dioxide output by the equivalent of 620 return flights a year between London and New York. John Guillebaud, co-chairman of OPT and emeritus professor of family planning at University College London, said: "The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. "The greatest thing anyone in Britain could do to help the future of the planet would be to have one less child."
Here's an idea: Why don't the "Greens" have ZERO children per couple? That will help make up for the pathetically few little rug rats the rest of us in the western world are having. As a bonus, there won't be any of them around to complain when the Islamo-Fascists completely overrun Europe.
And then there's this from seashepherd.org:
"Humans are presently acting upon this body in the same manner as an invasive virus with the result that we are eroding the ecological immune system.A virus kills its host and that is exactly what we are doing with our planet’s life support system. We are killing our host the planet Earth.""We need to radically and intelligently reduce human populations to fewer than one billion. "
As usual, it never occurs to these "environmentalists" that they should be leading by example.
No comments:
Post a Comment