Obama and the monkey god

I thought this was a joke when I first saw it at The Times of India website. Then I googled “Obama Lord Hanuman” and got a bunch of hits. It probably would be counterproductive to make too much of Obama’s lucky charm, but a story about his “faith” in a golden monkey idol of is just too good to ignore.

 

10 Concerns about Barack Obama

Bill Bennett has put together a two page summary of 10 Concerns about Barack Obama  that’s very well thought out.  He talked about it yesterday on his radio show (5-8am at 1070 AM).  I could make a similar list of problems I have with McCain, but on every one of them Obama is even worse.

 

The sky is falling!

“James Hansen, one of the world's leading climate scientists, will today call for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming…” [Link]

======<<<<>>>>======

I suppose pointing Mr. Hansen to the first amendment’s guarantee of free speech would be too much to ask of him, and do little good anyway. He would just point out that it doesn’t give us the right to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. On the other hand, just who is it that’s yelling “fire”?

Question of the day

Just curious…..How long have the Dimocrats been saying that drilling new wells won’t help reduce the price of gasoline because it takes 10 years to get it into production?

Also, if it’s true that ‘speculators’ are one of the culprits behind the recent price increase, doesn’t it follow that futures markets would react quickly if the U.S. announced an aggressive energy policy?

 

Just another broken promise

Obama Breaks Earlier Pledge on Public Financing
[Wall Street Journal]
Barack Obama announced today that he will not accept roughly $85 million in public funds for the general election, breaking his earlier pledge to do so if his Republican rival John McCain opted in to the system.

Global Warming and the Price of a Gallon of Gas

by John Coleman
(founder and former President of The Weather Channel)

You may want to give credit where credit is due to Al Gore and his global warming campaign the next time you fill your car with gasoline, because there is a direct connection between Global Warming and four dollar a gallon gas.  It is shocking, but true, to learn that the entire Global Warming frenzy is based on the environmentalist’s attack on fossil fuels, particularly gasoline.  All this big time science, international meetings, thick research papers, dire threats for the future; all of it, comes down to their claim that the carbon dioxide in the exhaust from your car and in the smoke stacks from our power plants is destroying the climate of planet Earth.  What an amazing fraud; what a scam.

[full text of speech]

 

$4 Gasbags

Wall Street Journal - June 12, 2008; Page A16

Anyone wondering why U.S. energy policy is so dysfunctional need only review Congress's recent antics. Members have debated ideas ranging from suing OPEC to the Senate's carbon tax-and-regulation monstrosity, to a windfall profits tax on oil companies, to new punishments for "price gouging" – everything except expanding domestic energy supplies.

Amid $135 oil, it ought to be an easy, bipartisan victory to lift the political restrictions on energy exploration and production. Record-high fuel costs are hitting consumers and business like a huge tax increase. Yet the U.S. remains one of the only countries in the world that chooses as a matter of policy to lock up its natural resources. The Chinese think we're insane and self-destructive, while the Saudis laugh all the way to the bank.  [link to full article]

Mallard nails it!

Dimocrats

Earmarks After Dark
Wall Street Journal - May 31, 2008; Page A10

Remember those Congressional pledges of earmark reform? Democrats are hoping you don't, as they try to pull a fast one and evade President Bush's pledge to block these special-interest spending projects slipped into legislation without scrutiny.

The battle is over the $601 billion defense authorization bill, which the House passed last week, 384-23. Earmarks are supposed to be included in the text of legislation. Instead, the Members have "airdropped," in Beltway parlance, a huge number of them into the conference report that accompanies the bill. And, to ensure that the money is spent on these dark-of-night additions, the Members have included language insisting that federal agencies do so.

This is a blatant attempt to override Mr. Bush's executive order earlier this year on earmarks. That order took direct aim at "airdropped" earmarks on grounds that they lack the force of law. If Members think their projects are defensible, then put them into actual legislation and vote on them. But because this can be politically embarrassing – think "bridge to nowhere" – Members prefer to slip their pork into the conference reports that offer instructions on implementation. These reports are written by staff members, aren't debated or voted on by Members, and aren't signed by the President. [full editorial]

---

One more proof (as if we needed it) that the only thing worse than a Republican is a Democrat.